• SonicOS 7.1 Rules and Policies
• Overview
  • About SonicOS
  • SonicOS Workflow
  • How to Use the SonicOS Administration Guides
  • Guide Conventions
• Settings
  • Configuring App/Match/Malware
  • Configuring Content Filtering Service (CFS)
    • SonicWall CFS
    • CFS Custom Category
  • Geo-IP
    • Custom List
      • Editing a Custom List Entry
      • Deleting Custom List Entries
    • Using Geo-IP Diagnostics
  • Botnet
    • Configuring Botnet Settings
    • Creating Custom Botnet Lists
    • Viewing Dynamic Botnets Lists
    • Configuring a Dynamic Botnet List Server
    • Using Botnet Diagnostics
  • Decryption (DPI-SSL)
    • Certificate
    • Common Name
    • SSL Servers
  • Decryption (DPI-SSH)
  • Signature Update
• Security Policy
  • User & Country
  • App/URL/Custom Match
• NAT Policy
  • About NAT in SonicOS
  • About NAT Load Balancing
    • Determining the NAT LB Method to Use
    • Caveats
    • How Load Balancing Algorithms are Applied
    • Sticky IP Algorithm Examples
      • Example One - Mapping to a Network
      • Example Two - Mapping to an IP Address Range
  • About NAT64
    • Use of Pref64::/n
  • About FQDN-based NAT
  • About Source MAC Address Override
  • Viewing NAT Policy Entries
    • Changing the Display
    • Filtering the Display
  • Adding or Editing NAT or NAT64 Rule Policies
  • Deleting NAT Policies
  • Creating NAT Rule Policies: Examples
    • Creating a One-to-One NAT Policy for Inbound Traffic
    • Creating a One-to-One NAT Policy for Outbound Traffic
    • Inbound Port Address Translation via One-to-One NAT Policy
    • Inbound Port Address Translation via WAN IP Address
    • Creating a Many-to-One NAT Policy
    • Creating a Many-to-Many NAT Policy
    • Creating a NAT Load Balancing Policy for Two Web Servers
• Routing
  • About Routing
    • About Metrics and Administrative Distance
      • About Metrics
      • About Administrative Distance
    • Route Advertisement
    • ECMP Routing
    • Policy-based Routing
    • Policy-based TOS Routing
    • PBR Metric-based Priority
    • Policy-based Routing and IPv6
    • OSPF and RIP Advanced Routing Services
      • About Routing Services
        • Protocol Type
        • Maximum Hops
        • Split-Horizon
        • Poison Reverse
        • Routing Table Updates
        • Subnet Sizes Supported
        • Autonomous System Topologies
      • OSPF Terms
    • Drop Tunnel Interface
    • App-based Routing
  • Rules and Policies >
    • Configuring
      • Adding Static Routes
      • Probe-Enabled Policy-based Routing Configuration
• Decryption Policy
  • Client-side SSL Rules
  • Server-side SSL Rules
  • SSH Rules
  • Setting up the Decryption Policy Table
    • Managing the Decryption Policy Toolbars
    • Changing the Policy Priority
    • Creating Decryption Policies
      • Adding Decryption Policies
      • Editing Decryption Policies
      • Deleting Decryption Policies
• DoS Policy
  • Setting up the DoS Policy Table
    • Managing the DoS Policy Toolbars
    • Changing the DoS Policy Priority
    • Creating DoS Policies
      • Adding DoS Policies
      • Editing DoS Policies
      • Deleting DoS Policies
• DNS Policy
  • Creating DNS Policies
    • Adding DNS Policies
    • Editing DNS Policies
    • Deleting DNS Policies
  • DNS Doctoring
• Endpoint Policy
• Shadow
• SonicWall Support
  • About This Document

OSPF and RIP Advanced Routing Services

In addition to Policy-based Routing and RIP advertising, SonicOS offers the option of enabling Advanced Routing Services (ARS). Advanced Routing Services provides full advertising and listening support for the Routing Information Protocol (RIPv1 - RFC1058) and (RIPv2 - RFC2453), and Open Shortest Path First (OSPFv2 – RFC2328). Advanced Routing Service should only be enabled by those environments requiring support for either or both of these dynamic routing protocols.

RIP and OSPF are Interior Gateway Protocols (IGP) that are both widely used by networks of various sizes to automate the process of route distribution. RIP is commonly used within smaller networks, while OSPF is used by larger networks, although network size should not be the only factor used to determine the appropriateness of one protocol over the other – network speed, interoperability requirements, and relative overall complexity, for example, should also be considered. RIPv1 and RIPv2 are both supported by ARS, the largest differences between the two being that RIPv2 supports VLSM (Variable Length Subnet Masks), authentication, and routing updates. Routing Information Protocol Differences illustrates the major differences between RIPv1, RIPv2, and OSPFv2/OSPFv3:

• About Routing Services

• OSPF Terms