SonicOS 7.0 Rules and Policies for Classic Mode
- SonicOS 7.0 Rules and Policies
- Access Rules
- Setting Firewall Access Rules
- About Connection Limiting
- Using Bandwidth Management with Access Rules
- Creating Access Rules
- Configuring Access Rules for IPv6
- Enabling and Disabling Access Rules
- Editing Access Rules
- Deleting Access Rules
- Restoring Access Rules to Default Settings
- Displaying Access Rules
- Displaying Access Rule Traffic Statistics
- Configuring Access Rules for NAT64
- Configuring Access Rules for a Zone
- Access Rules for DNS Proxy
- User Priority for Access Rules
- Access Rule Configuration Examples
- Setting Firewall Access Rules
- NAT Rules
- About NAT in SonicOS
- About NAT Load Balancing
- About NAT64
- About FQDN-based NAT
- About Source MAC Address Override
- Viewing NAT Policy Entries
- Adding or Editing NAT or NAT64 Rule Policies
- Deleting NAT Policies
- Creating NAT Rule Policies: Examples
- Creating a One-to-One NAT Policy for Inbound Traffic
- Creating a One-to-One NAT Policy for Outbound Traffic
- Inbound Port Address Translation via One-to-One NAT Policy
- Inbound Port Address Translation via WAN IP Address
- Creating a Many-to-One NAT Policy
- Creating a Many-to-Many NAT Policy
- Creating a One-to-Many NAT Load Balancing Policy
- Creating a NAT Load Balancing Policy for Two Web Servers
- Creating a WAN-to-WAN Access Rule for a NAT64 Policy
- DNS Doctoring
- Routing
- Content Filter Rules
- App Rules
- About App Rules
- Rules and Policies > App Rules
- Verifying App Rules Configuration
- App Rules Use Cases
- Creating a Regular Expression in a Match Object
- Policy-based Application Rules
- Logging Application Signature-based Policies
- Compliance Enforcement
- Server Protection
- Hosted Email Environments
- Email Control
- Web Browser Control
- HTTP Post Control
- Forbidden File Type Control
- ActiveX Control
- FTP Control
- Bandwidth Management
- Bypass DPI
- Custom Signature
- Reverse Shell Exploit Prevention
- Endpoint Rules
- SonicWall Support
Poison Reverse
Also known as route poisoning, an extension of split-horizon where a network is advertised with a metric of 16 (unreachable), helping to ensure that incorrect alternative routes are not propagated.
OSPF does not have to impose a hop count limit because it does not advertise entire routing tables, rather it generally only sends link state updates when changes occur. This is a significant advantage in larger networks in that it converges more quickly, produces less update traffic, and supports an unlimited number of hops.
Was This Article Helpful?
Help us to improve our support portal