SonicOS 7.0 Objects
- SonicOS 7.0
- Match Objects
- Zones
- How Zones Work
- Default Zones
- Security Types
- Allow Interface Trust
- Effect of Wireless Controller Modes
- Zones Overview
- The Zones Page
- Adding a New Zone
- Adding a New Zone in Policy Mode
- Adding a New Zone in Classic Mode
- Configuring a Zone for Guest Access
- Configuring a Zone for Open Authentication and Social Login
- Configuring the WLAN Zone
- Configuring the RADIUS Server
- Configuring DPI-SSL Granular Control per Zone
- Enabling Automatic Redirection to the User-Policy Page
- Cloning a Zone
- Editing a Zone
- Deleting Custom Zones
- Addresses
- Addresses Page
- About UUIDs for Address Objects and Groups
- Working with Dynamic Address Objects
- Services
- URI Lists
- Schedules
- Dynamic Group
- Email Addresses
- Match Objects
- Countries
- Applications
- Web Categories
- Websites
- Match Patterns
- Custom Match
- Profile Objects
- Endpoint Security
- Bandwidth
- QoS Marking
- Content Filter
- DHCP Option
- Block Page
- Anti-Spyware
- Gateway Anti-Virus
- Log and Alerts
- Intrusion Prevention
- AWS
- Action Profiles
- Security Action Profile
- DoS Action Profile
- Action Objects
- App Rule Actions
- Content Filter Actions
- Object Viewer
- SonicWall Support
Using an Internal DNS Server for FQDN-based Access Rules or Security Policies
It is common for dynamically configured (DHCP) network environments to work in combination with internal DNS servers for the purposes of dynamically registering internal hosts – a common example of this is Microsoft’s DHCP and DNS services. Hosts on such networks can easily be configured to dynamically update DNS records on an appropriately configured DNS server, refer to Microsoft Knowledge base article, How to configure DNS dynamic updates in Windows.
The following illustrates a packet dissection of a typical DNS dynamic update process, showing the dynamically configured host 10.50.165.249 registering its full hostname bohuymuth.moosifer.com with the (DHCP provided) DNS server 10.50.165.3.
In such environments, it could prove useful to employ FQDN AOs to control access by hostname. This would be most applicable in networks where hostnames are known, such as where hostname lists are maintained, or where a predictable naming convention is used.
Was This Article Helpful?
Help us to improve our support portal